case study :: essays research papers

Philosophy 324Case 9Is a good lawyer just considered good if they keep their confidences with their clients and win their consequences? Or is their more to a good lawyer? I think on that point should be much more. Lawyers should be obligated to doing the object lessonly right deed even if it means losing the case. This is what the virtuous agent imagination suggests. Considering this concept, we may no longer believe that a good lawyer is simply an stiff legal advocate. Rather, a good attorney should be effective morally, as well as seting his clients cause. It is because of this that one can non conclude that a good attorney is one who just wins cases. A lawyer is not just a good legal advocate. An attorney must stick out himself in the behavior of a morally good person and perform desirable character traits. I believe that the moral agent concept is the ethical way to conduct yourself as a lawyer. I go forth defend my thesis by offering reasons for my position, includi ng moral theories, objections to my position employ moral theories, and responses to the objections which are stated.My first reason that the moral agent concept is ethical is there is a point when the moral agent impart not worry about winning the case because to win the case would involve unethical actions. This reason is backed up by the moral theory deontology. The moral agent treats others as ends in themselves and not as clean means to winning cases. For example, a defendant in a murder trial confesses to his attorney that he is indeed guilty of the crime. The moral agent would not allow for this case to continue. The attorney would report to the governance that his client is guilty. If the lawyer did not report this to the authorities and continued to represent his client, he would be treating the victim and the victims family as mere means to winning the case. Doing this would be unethical. Someone might argue development deontology that in a circumstance where the lawy er reports his client after he admits to the murder, the lawyer is betraying his clients trust and treating his client as means. A lawyer cannot swear to his client that everything, including unethical information, will remain unavowed if he is going to end up telling on his client. nix would hire attorneys if they reported privileged information to the authorities.