Ethics

The facts of the case argon these. George has a PhD in chemistry and is having apprehension finding work. His wife has come acrossn a demarcation to stand for them which brings up the problem of who will watch their small children. His sense datum has told him that he can purport George a job with a teleph unmatchabler that does research into the field of chemical and biological warfare. George is unlettered about taking this job because he is opposed to this bright symbol of warfare. His mate raises a nonher issue. He says that if George doesnt take the job, soulfulness else who is not opposed to chemical warfare will get the job and this person will do the job with more than zeal. His friend also tells him that his refusal of the job will not tie it or the company go away.         The key facts in the attitude are that George desperately needs work, that he is opposed to functional for a company that does research into chemical and biologi cal warfare, and that if he doesnt take the job someone else with more zeal for it will. The fact that at that place is a problem of someone reflection the children is a unoriginal issue.         The debate or concern in this situation is whether or not George should take the job. On the one hand, if he takes the job, he will be able to back off his wife and children plainly will be working on something he is virtuously against.

He could eventually be answerable for something that has the potential to pervert thousands or millions of people. Also, if he takes the job he may not work to the b est of his abilities, as he is opposed to wh! at the company is doing. He would not be fulfilling his trading to his employer. On... Ethics is difficult to congeal what is right and what is wrong in some situations. This is a legal analysis and argument. Well done. If you want to get a unspoiled essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper