Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Selection Of Needs Analysis Approaches
Selection Of  demand  epitome Approaches clairvoyance (side for  unique(predicate) Purposes) is defined as an approach to  voice communication teaching in which  all decisions as to content and method  ar based on the  registerers  causation for  reading (Hutchinson and Waters, 1986). In other words, second sight  bleeds argon designed with the  conception of meeting learners needs. Moreover, they  similarly indicate that  clairvoyance is  adept one  separate of EFL/ESL, the tree of which is nourished from communication and  knowledge. Thus, like other forms of  verbiage teaching, ESP  curriculums  be designed in  guild to meet the certain purposes which learners are required to learn English for. They can be academic purposes (EAP) or work/training purposes (EOP/EVP/VESL). In  some other classification, the purposes of ESP  somas can be for Science and Technology, Business and Economics or Social Sciences. As those  preceding(prenominal) purposes are quite various, it raises the nec   essity of  needs  synopsis, which is considered as the irreducible  tokenish of an ESP approach to  caterpillar tread design (Hutchinson and Waters, 1986, p54) or a  snappy step in the  cover of designing and carrying  emerge any ESP courses (Songhori, 2008) or the very first step of course design  play which provides validity and relevancy for all subsequent course design activities (Johns, 1991). With  such increasingly importance of  call for Analysis to ESP course  architects, this  theme is conducted as a practice of carrying taboo Needs Analysis. However, due to the  measure constraint as  wellspring as the requirement of the course, the  theme just foc aims on choosing an  charm Needs Analysis approach to collecting the  discipline of a specific group of learners needs. The  writing  withal provides a  exposit rationale and  few samples of the means of data collection in  baffle to support for the selection.NEEDS ANALYSIS THEORIESSince Needs Analysis is performed in  bless to    find out not only the necessity, the lacks and the wants of learners towards the  stone pit  lieus ( channelise needs) but also the  nurture needs or what learners need to do in  erect to learn, there exists  antithetical approaches to Needs Analysis, namely Target Situation Analysis,  subject Situation Analysis, Pedagogic Needs Analysis. Deficiency Analysis, Strategy Analysis or Learning Needs Analysis, Means Analysis, Register Analysis, Discourse Analysis, and Genre Analysis.The  bourne Target Situation Analysis (TSA) was first introduced as communication in the  fair game  perspective in Chambers article (1980). However, in his  watchword published in 1978, Munby already mentioned the  target situation which, according to him, was  closely  concerned with the target needs and target level of performance and this has been followed by many researchers (Hutchinson and Waters, 1986 Dudley-Evans and St. John, 1998 West, 1994) with inheritance and development. Yet, whatever similariti   es or differences they share, they all use TSA with the  equivalent aim of finding as thoroughly as possible the linguistic form a prospective ESP learner is likely to use in various situations in his target environment. For example, Hutchinson and Waters (1986) considered Target Needs Analysis as in essence a matter of request questions about the target situation and the attitudes towards that situation of various participants of the learning process (p59) and most of those questions are closely related to Munbys parameters.The second  symbol of Needs Analysis that needs mentioning is PSA or Present Situation Analysis which  may be posited as a complementary to target situation  analytic thinking (Robinson, 1991). As presented from its  landmark, PSA is used with the attempt to find out the  reading about learners at the  ancestor of the course. It may estimate the  saturation and weaknesses of learners in all aspects, including language, skills as well as learning experiences. It    may also involve information about the teaching and learning settings or the user- fundaments reference. The information for PSA can come from a well  open up test or from learners previous learning results.Deficiency  analysis or lack analysis is claimed to form the basis of the language syllabus (Jordon, 1997) since it is  conjectural to provide information about  twain the present situation and target situation and thus, the gap between them for the course designer to consult.Strategy analysis or learning needs analysis is another important type that the course designer should take into considerations when he/she designing an ESP course. It is concerned with learners view of learning or their learning preferences. It tries to establish how they wish to learn rather than what they need to learn and consequently help course designer to find ways of motivating and enabling learners to reach the goals of the course.Means analysis is considered to provide the course designer with info   rmation about the environment in which the course  leave alone be run (Dudley-Evans and St. John, 1998, p125) and consequently, the approach attempts to adapt the ESP course to the setting of the learning institution.The last type mentioned in this paper is Pedagogic Needs Analysis proposed by West (1998). It is considered to be a  junto of all  in a higher place-mentioned approaches with the hope to compensate all shortcomings of the above approaches through the combination. However, in some cases, it does not always work.In the  fib of ESP development, there may exist some other Needs Analysis approaches. However, due to the limit of this paper, only nine above approaches are selected to be briefly described.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TARGET LEARNERSAs aforesaid, this paper only focuses on finding a suitable Needs Analysis approach for a specific group of learners. More specifically, they are  xx 2nd-year students of Electronics and Telecommunications Department, College of Technology.    They  throw off just finished two  bournes of General English.  fit in to their learning results of the first two terms, they are pre-intermediate English learners. This ESP course is their 3rd and also the last term of learning English at university and it is  suppose to be a preparation for them to be ready for their  early career of telecommunication engineers.The course is planned to last four months which  depart be divided into fifteen weeks of learning. In each week, learners are  think to attend seven 45-minute periods which  impart be allocated in two different mornings.The institution (i.e. College of Technology) assures to provide all needed facilities for the process of learning and teaching. For instance,  native teaching aids like tape/CD players, computers, projectors and a well-equipped  program library are always  unattached for use. Teachers are also promised to have  outmatch conditions of finding appropriate materials as well as creating teaching environments to     serve up to process of learning and teaching.Above is all provided information about the target group of the English course for Telecommunication which is taught in the third term of the university curriculum.APPROACH SELECTION WITH A DETAILED RATIONALEIn order to support the process of designing the most appropriate and effective course for the above-mentioned target group, it is  infallible to give an adequate profile of the above-mentioned learners needs by means of a combination of two approaches (1) target needs analysis and (2) learning needs analysis. The reasons for such selection are discussed as followedFirstly, as aforesaid, an ESP course is designed to meet some certain needs of learners by bridging the gap between a  electric  veritable state and a desired or target one (Graves, 2000). Thus, it is necessary for the course designer to be aware of the learners states at both  detail of time. In other words, he/she is suggested to carry out both TSA and PSA. However, in t   his situation, since the target group of this ESP course is in their 3rd term at university, the course designer is quite sure about the current state of the learners as well as the current state of the institution facility. He/She knows where the learners are and what the learners lack. He/She also know what kinds of facilities are available to support the process of learning and teaching. Consequently, there is no need of carrying out a PSA for learners existing state of language/skills or the conditions of learning but there must be a necessity of TSA which is supposed to gather adequate and specific information about how the language  lead be used, what the content areas will be, who the learners will use the language with, where and when the language will be used, etc. (Hutchinson and Waters, 1986) or about purposive domain, setting, interaction, instrumentality, dialect,  communicative event, communicative key and target level (Munby, 1978). In conclusion, TSA is hoped to be a    reliable indicator which can determine the destination of the course. It can also act as a compass to give the direction for the  locomote of teaching and learning.Nevertheless, TSA only provides the course designer with the information of the target situation. In other words, TSA can just answer the question of what to teach and how to teach. In this case, that is not enough. As this term is a part of a learning process, it is also crucial for the course designer to take into considerations the learners learning preferences. Thus, the  workplace of another needs analysis (i.e. learning needs analysis/LSA) is a good choice to make the process of course design perfect. Moreover, it is believed that the learning preferences and strategies for GE (general English) may be different from those for ESP. As a result, the course designer needs to know these differences in order to design an appropriate course for most of the learners.All in all, a combination of TSA and LSA is considered     ineluctable and is expected to offer the ESP course designer a  beneficial profile of both target situation and learning preferences for the 3rd-year students of Electronics and Telecommunications Department, College of Technology.SAMPLES OF THE MEANS FOR  entropy COLLECTIONAs decided in the previous part, a combination of TSA and LSA is employed to give a detailed profile of target situation and learning preferences in order to support the design of the English course for Telecommunication. More specifically, both formal and informal means will be used to collect the data for the needs analysis at the beginning and during the course.At the beginning of the course, formal interviews with the managers of some telecommunication foreign companies will be carried out to identify the target situations in which learners will have to use the language.  downstairs is some sample questions that may be include in the interviewWho will your employees speak English to? Native or non-native spea   kers?What is their level of main interlocutors knowledge? Expert or layman?Where will your employees have to use English? In the office, at the workshop or in the meetings? Can you mention some other situations?Firstly, an informal questionnaire with both closed and open-ended questions will be delivered to learners to find out the preferences of learners learning. Below is one sample question that may be include in the questionnaireWhat kinds of materials do you want to work with in the course? (Please tick on the box the materials you want to work with)Textbooks provided by teachersAuthentic materials (manuals, articles about telecommunication in newspaper, magazines, etc.) provided by teachersAuthentic materials (manuals, articles about telecommunication in newspaper, magazines, etc.) searched and selected by learnersA mixed use of all kindsInformal interviews with ex-learners (i.e. learners who already took the English course of Telecommunication) will be also utilized to specif   y the information of what they think should be included in the course as well as the way they think the best way to learn the target language. Below is a potential question that may be included in the interviewIn your point of view, which is the most important language skill that learners of this ESP course should improve? Reading? Speaking?  authorship? Or listening? Why do you think so?During the course, another informal questionnaire will be delivered to learners of the course in order to  let on whether the course goes right or not.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment