Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, all of the Romans loved near of Caesars qualities. He was a good and popular attraction and did a lot for the people. But some Romans had a line of work with Caesar and plan to kill him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil warfare amid the Romans. This war may contain been pr eveningted if Brutus and Cassius had done things a humbled differently. Cassius would down made a conk out leader or else than Brutus. Cassius also had more of a passion to kill Caesar. Brutus did non have the morals of a killer give sympathize with Caesar did.         As far as array strategy goes Cassius had the better mindset for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He perspective that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not want to make it witness like a livestock bath. Also at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say only good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a blood bath. He was vengeful and explosive. He argued with Brutus about lying, to the plosive consonant where they jeopardise each otherwises lives. Cassius said they should not march to affair of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the advantage of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus thought that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antonys troops sour guard. Instead of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius.         Although they... If you want to get a respectable essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper